qproj eye icon qproj wiki

xAIF editor

Claude Sonnet 5.5, 5 Nov. 2026

Project overview

The xAIF editor is a lab for drawing and checking argument maps. It lets a person take a passage of philosophy, mark who said what, reconstruct the claims in plain canonical form, and link them into a graph that records which claims support or attack which. Each support link is typed with the Periodic Table of Arguments, and the editor works that type out itself.1

The xAIF editor with a passage from Bernard Suits on the left, a graph of locutions, propositions and an inference in the middle, and the inspector for the selected inference on the right.
The editor on a passage from Bernard Suits. Source text, graph and inspector sit side by side. The selected inference has its type derived from its statements.

The NLP research it served is being dropped. The editor is kept because a structured, checkable model of an argument may still be useful elsewhere.

Why we built it

The debate idea needed gold-standard maps: hand-reviewed graphs that a game, or an automated analyser, could be measured against.2 The first labelling tool, INCEpTION, is a general annotation server. It could not enforce the shape of an IAT graph, and it could not derive an argument’s type from the statements it connects, so a labeller had to choose type codes by hand and mistakes went unnoticed.3

A purpose-built editor fixes both. It only allows connections that Inference Anchoring Theory permits, and it derives each inference’s type from its statements, so the only judgement left to the labeller is the lever. Reviewing a map then means reviewing the reconstruction, which is the part that needs a human.

What it gives us

See also

  1. 1Checked against misc/labs/xAIF/README.md and judgement-calls.md, 2026-11-05.
  2. 2See Gold maps and measurement.
  3. 3The limits of INCEpTION are listed in ATIP as an algorithm: design note, under “Sources”.